Edgar Zilsel: Philosopher, Historian, Sociologist

Part I: Edgar Zilsel: Philosopher, Historian, Sociologist.- Chapter 1. Introduction.- Chapter 2. From the Problem of Genius to the Integration of Philosophy, History, and Sociology of Science: Edgar Zilsel's Life and Work Viewed in the Context of Recent Historiography and Research.- Chapter 3. The Circumstances of Edgar Zilsel's Failed Habilitation. A Case Study on the Instigations of Anti-Semitic and Conservative Academic Networks in the 1920s at the University of Vienna.- Chapter 4. On Thermodynamics and Society: Zilsel's Epistemology and Politics Across Disciplinary Boundaries.- Chapter 5. Edgar Zilsel: Excellent Qualifications of an Awkward Man.- Chapter 6. The Law of Large Numbers. Edgar Zilsel's Attempt at the Foundation of Physical and Socio-historical Laws.- Chapter 7. Facts of Nature or Products of Reason? Edgar Zilsel Caught Between Ontological and Epistemic Conceptions of Natural Laws.- Chapter 8. Applications and Applicability. Zilsel's Criticism of Carnap's Early View on Protocol Statements.- Chapter 9. Laws, Causality, and Retribution - Hans Kelsen and Edgar Zilsel. A Marginal Note.- Chapter 10. How to Explain the Modern Personality Cult. Some Reflections on Edgar Zilsel's Studies on the Modern Genius-Veneration.- Chapter 11. Insufficient Recognition: Comparing Julian Hirsch's and Edgar Zilsel's Analyses of the Glorification of Personalities.- Chapter 12. The Religion of Genius Taken Seriously. Edgar Zilsel's Die Geniereligion (1918) Reviewed as a Critical Philosophical Treatise.- Chapter 13. The Epistemological Foundations of the Zilsel Thesis.- Chapter 14. Social and Epistemic Interactions Between Artisans and Scholars in Iberia. A Zilselian Reading of Early Modern Maritime Expansion.- Chapter 15. Engineering and Mathematical Logic. Another 'Zilsel-Case' From the History of Computing.- Chapter 16. Zilsel's Genius, or the Epistemic Fecundity of Neutrality.- Chapter 17. Zilsel, Zilsel: Reconnecting With an Intellectual Legacy That Deserves to be

Donata Romizi has studied Philosophy at the University of Bologna (where she also attended the interdisciplinary "Collegio Superiore") and at the University of Vienna (PhD, 2013). She now works at the University of Vienna: she is Tenure-Track Assistant Professor at the Department of Philosophy and Vice-Director of the postgraduate program "Philosophical Practice" (which she initiated in 2013) at the Postgraduate Center. Her main publications so far have been in the field of (History of) Philosophy of Science: she has published on the philosophy of probability and statistics, on the Vienna Circle and on the issue of scientific determinism. Her book Dem wissenschaftlichen Determinismus auf der Spur (Karl Alber, 2019) was awarded the Karl Alber Prize 2019. Further main publications: Fare i conti con il caso. La probabilità e l'emergere dell'indeterminismo nella fisica moderna (Bologna: Gedit, 2009). "The Vienna Circle's 'Scientific World Conception': Philosophy of Science in thePolitical Arena", in: HOPOS. The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, Vol. 2, No. 2; Fall 2012.



Monika Wulz is a philosopher and historian of science. After finishing her PhD at the University of Vienna, she was a postdoc researcher at the Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, at the Technical University of Braunschweig, at the University of Konstanz, and at ETH Zurich. Currently, she is a postdoc researcher and lecturer at the Chair of Science Studies at the University of Lucerne. Her research is situated at the intersection of Philosophy of Science, History of Science, and the history of social and economic thought. Her publications focus on the epistemological traditions in French philosophy, including her book Erkenntnisagenten: Gaston Bachelard und die Reorganisation des Wissens (Kadmos, 2010), on the philosophy of Ernst Mach and the Vienna Circle as well as on social